|
< ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman">Economics is a mathematical discipline. This assertion may seem strange to the traditional political economist, but mathematical methods were introduced at an early stage (Cournot,1838) in the two-hundred-year history of our subject and have been steadily growing in significance .At the present time and, essentially, since the end of World War</FONT>Ⅱ<FONT face="Times New Roman">,mathematical methods have become predominant in American economics. The mathematical approach was originally inspired in Europe and England but it has flowered in America, with no little stimulus from European immigrants. The mathematical approach is steadily gaining favor throughout the world, especially because the younger generation in developing economics is embracing the new methods and because the socialist countries have shed a previous bias against the use of mathematical methods in economics. It is clear that the future development of economics will see continued and increasing use of mathematics, although it would be rash to assume that the future course of economic analysis will be predominantly mathematical as it has been in the last twenty years.</FONT></FONT></P>
< align=center><B><FONT face="Times New Roman">The Economic Problem<p></p></FONT></B></P>
< ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>A favored definition of economics (Lionel Robbins, 1932) is “…the science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.” Whether or not we accept this definition as bracketing all of economics, it is a good starting point for our discussion of the role of mathematics .I might want to sharpen this definition by noting that economists try to select among alternative uses of scarce resources in such a way as to make the most efficient (or lease wasteful) employment of resources to achieve stated ends.</FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>Stated in this way, we see clearly that economics involves optimization, and this is the engine that produces principles of economic analysis. We have either a maximum problem or a minimum problem, which is a compelling reason for the use of mathematics. An abstract economy is viewed as consisting of numerous consuming and producing units, who make optimal decisions about their own economic behaviour, given market prices, and then interact with one another to clear supply and demand in markets to determine prices.</FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>Economic theory usually begins with an analysis of the individual consumer who attempts to maximize his satisfaction, subject to a budget constraint (or to minimize budget outlays for the attainment of any given level of satisfaction).The theory then takes up the analysis of producers who strive to maximize profits, Subject to a technological constraint (or minimize cost for reaching a given output level, subject to a technological constraint). These are the typical optimization problems of economics.</FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>The standard mathematical formulations of these problems are as follows. The consumer problem is to maximize a utility function </FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><v:shapetype><v:stroke joinstyle="miter"></v:stroke><v:formulas><v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"></v:f><v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"></v:f><v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"></v:f></v:formulas><v:path connecttype="rect" gradientshapeok="t" extrusionok="f"></v:path><lock aspectratio="t" v:ext="edit"></lock></v:shapetype><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>of quantities </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> of goods and services consumed, subject to the requirement of living within a fixed income </FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>where </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> are the respective prices of the goods and services consumed. The producer problem is to maximize income minus production costs</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>where </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> are inputs of factors of production and </FONT></FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> are their costs, subject to the restraint imposed by a technical production function</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>of the quantities </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> of goods and services produced and of the production factor inputs </FONT></FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>.</FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>These two formulations pose the economic problem as the maximization of utility (satisfaction), subject to a budget constraint, and the maximization of profit, subject to a technologicsi constraint.We could also formulate minimum problems that seek minimum production costs for producing a given combination of outputs and the least-cost budget to achieve a given level of utility.</FONT></P>
<P align=center><B><FONT face="Times New Roman">Treatment of optimization problems</FONT></B></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>The consequences of these maximization or minimization problems have been enormous for economics in building a set of rules of behavior. Nearly all economic truths have some root in these or closely related propositions. The original mathematical attack was quite straightforward. Assume that </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>and </FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>are smooth continuous functions (with first and second deriva tives), and optimize according to the rules of the differential calculus, given market prices. The necessary and sufficient conditions for optimization define the well –known demand and supply functions of economics of economics and establish many properties of these functions.</FONT></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT size=3> For the problem as I have stated it, these solutions are well established and have been in the literature of economics for more than fifty years. Refined points are made from time to time but the ramifications of this theory were made clear in mathematical treatments by Pareto (1896), Slutsky (1915), Fisher (1892), Hotelling (1932), Frisch (1932), Hicks and Allen (1943), Samuelson (1947).</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> In the 1930's, and again after World War </FONT>Ⅱ<FONT face="Times New Roman">, these problems received extended mathematical treatment ,The extensions were to optimize over time either continuously or in finite incremental periods and to enlarge the number of side conditions. In stochastic models (i.e., those that incorporate chance), uncertainty about future conditions such as price can be introduced. Also, we can allow for the accumulation of tiny neglected factors that always influence human decisions.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> The subjective nature of the utility function, </FONT></FONT><v:shape><v:imagedata><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3></FONT></v:imagedata></v:shape><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> led to analysis of conditions in which the results of optimization would be invariant under transformations of the function and to study of the possibility of deriving a utility function, starting from objective demand functions. The latter problem became known as the integrability problem.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> It may be remarked that the early development of mathematical economics followed the steps of physics and engineering. There are many analogies between the classical methods of mathematical economics and the laws of mechanics, thermodynamics, and similar branches of science. In some cases, there was a tendency to draw strict analogies that could hardly be rationalized in terms of economic behavior.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> An idea that received much encouragement from J. Von Neumann was that mathematical economics should draw upon different branches of mathematics that were more suited to the peculiar nature of the economic problem and economic variables. It was even suggested that new mathematical methods might be developed that would be tailored to economics .In the sense that mathematicians of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries developed methods that were suited to the problems of physics, we might hope that modern mathematicians would receive inspiration from problems of economics, and social sciences generally. To some extent, this development has occurred in linear programming and optimization theory for situations in which the ordinary methods of differential calculus do not apply. It is up to the mathematicians themselves, however, to decide the significance of this line of development in modern mathematics.</FONT></FONT></P>
<P ><FONT size=3><FONT face="Times New Roman"> ----------Lawrence R.Klein</FONT></FONT></P> |
|